Eyeballs and Van Halen

Van Halen Tour at Bell Center, Montreal on 10th November, 2007. Photo courtesy of anirudhkoul
Every medium has its message. I remember watching my first music video at my neighbours in Deerfield, Illinois - it was Van Halen's "Jump." For me it was a significant shift towards a visual reception of music. Suddenly singers were sort-of-actors who had to perform for a new genre on tv. Eventually the format faded away in lieu of digital download abundance and expensive concert tickets. Albeit, today we're seeing small a revival of music videos in the likes of tape.tv.
Thanks to Cerf and Lee, server traffic exploded with an ample amount of unchecked energy consumption. We're seeing the Tribune from the Windy City grasp Chapter 11 and Seattle PI's move to web only. Undisclosed sources tell me that papers in Germany are loosing shares, minus 15, minus 22 percent as compared to Q1 in 2008.
Papers got lazy and fat with mostly overpriced ads and offered very little response measurements for their clients, they never had to deliver, just eyeballs. And one more minor but significant detail: the print product only changed its appearance and forgot to change its inner workings, such as a process overhaul, people management and more importantly the production and packaging of content. Amazingly enough, that's where the core competence of newspapers lies.
Now that the online eyeball system is creating new gernes of search optimized text, it feels akin to another "Jump" moment, with a limited shift. One of Berlin's tabloids, the BZ, now hires journalists with keyword trend skills from search results. Everyone wants to to be on the first page of Silicon Valley's behemoth, no one on page seven. Is the tabloid more relevant if it pimps itself with unreadable text or does it simply want to remain findable?
For quality journalism to remain economically viable, it needs to create a balance between relevance in terms of real stories that matter to the common record and being found on the WWW. I think the strongest argument for print is that it is truly independent from digital algorythms and can focus purely on the message - not the one paid by corporate bills.
There is enough room for innovation to focus on credibility and trustworthiness of their content. The current reception of print newspapers is that they're loosing eyeballs and revenues. I think the biggest opportunity lies in contrast to less trustworthy search related results. Moreover, print can revive itself with better response measurements for their clients coupled with enjoyable, readable and relevant content that includes the people formerly known as the audience. Go ahead and jump.











